A proposal to switch Fedora Workstation's desktop

I prefer GNOME but I suppose I could get used to KDE, since after all KDE is very customizable. Either way I strongly agree with the original "Fedora Workstation" branding change and I think that there should be one and only one "main" edition, whether that is a GNOME desktop or a KDE desktop. I use Fedora because it is an "opinionated" distribution that focuses on building a well-integrated and cohesive product. If you want a build-your-own distro construction kit then there are plenty of other alternatives in that ecological niche (Arch, Gentoo, Nix, Debian etc). Actually I use Fedora Silverblue because it goes even further in the direction of having a single canonical system image and separating out user-installable software down into various container technologies, but i digress. Fedora doesn't try to be all things to all people and I like that.

GNOME's architecture does seem to integrate more seamlessly with the surrounding operating system platform, since for all its faults GObject does interoperate nicely across different implementation languages in a way that C++ and MOC (does Qt still use this?) does not and never will; there is a hard border between KDE Frameworks and fd.o projects and systemd etc in a way that isn't there for GNOME technologies. Which I think is a point in favor of choosing GNOME as the user interface for a highly vertically integrated OS project, if that makes any sense. On the other hand GNOME's development team does have a rather, well, let's say tenacious commitment to a particular vision of how a user's workflow should operate, and that workflow works for some people but definitely does not work for others.

(incidentally I am reminded of this famous mailing list post, the question at hand today is more about user preferences than relative technical maturity but I think a lot of the earlier points still apply http://www.islinuxaboutchoice.com/ )