|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Project Treble

Project Treble

Posted Sep 21, 2018 11:22 UTC (Fri) by excors (subscriber, #95769)
In reply to: Project Treble by epa
Parent article: Project Treble

One difference is that Apple gets something like $10B/year income from the App Store (vs about $100B/year income from iPhones, but the App Store income is presumably all profit), so they make a non-trivial amount of money even when customers aren't buying new hardware. Android device vendors don't get that, since the app income goes to Google.

Apple also sells a much larger number of units of each model than most Android vendors, so they can more easily afford the per-model cost of developing updates. And their scale lets them do a lot more of the hardware and low-level software in-house, rather than relying on third-party vendors, so updates don't depend on negotiations between multiple companies with not-necessarily-aligned goals.


to post comments

Project Treble

Posted Sep 22, 2018 9:41 UTC (Sat) by MarcB (subscriber, #101804) [Link] (1 responses)

> One difference is that Apple gets something like $10B/year income from the App Store ... Android device vendors don't get that, since the app income goes to Google.

This is so obviously a major point, and yet, I never thought of it. Thanks ;-)

Additionally, vendors do not get the ad revenue Android brings in.

Project Treble

Posted Sep 23, 2018 2:25 UTC (Sun) by giraffedata (guest, #1954) [Link]

No company can afford to leave money on the table.

Anyone at Apple who said, "we're making so much money on this other product that we don't need to concern ourselves with making money on this one" or "we're making enough profit on this product that we're not going to bother trying to sell more of them" would be laughed out of the board room.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds