|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Practical security for 2014

Practical security for 2014

Posted Jan 17, 2014 17:03 UTC (Fri) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198)
In reply to: Practical security for 2014 by nix
Parent article: Practical security for 2014

That sounds truly awful and that is not what I expect to be the norm. I figure the best effort is spent on making the reference design really work well and licensing it liberally, these small vendors aren't going to invest in writing their own if they can easily pick up one cheaply or for free. They differentiate in their awful UIs and not in the underlying components which actually do the work.


to post comments

Practical security for 2014

Posted Jan 18, 2014 20:41 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

Agreed. However, if the UI is so bad that nobody can figure out how to use it unless they read zh_TW, I'm not sure it matters how good the underlying code is (except that it might be less likely to fail completely).


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds